Close-up pictures were taken of the study participants' irises, and they also filled out a questionnaire about their personalities.

The researchers looked at crypts (pits) and contraction furrows (lines curving around the outer edge of the iris), which are formed when pupils dilate.

It was found that those with more crypts were likely to be tender, warm and trusting, while those with more furrows were more likely to be neurotic, impulsive and give in to cravings.

'Trajectories'

The researchers suggest that a neurodevelopmental gene called PAX6 could also play a major role.

It is known to help control the development of the iris in an embryo.

Previous research has also shown that a mutation of PAX6 is linked to impulsiveness and poor social skills.

The team, led by Dr Matt Larsson a behavioural scientist, said: "These findings support the notion that people with different iris configurations tend to develop along different trajectories in regards to personality.

"Differences in the iris can be used as a biomarker that reflects differences between people."

Dr George Fieldman, principal lecturer in psychology at Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, said: "This is very interesting. It shows that some aspects of personality have a genetic base and to identify them in the eye in this fascinating way is significant.

"It is surprising that this is possible. But it seems that the old aphorism that 'the eyes are the window to the soul' has some genetic basis."

He said it opened up the possibility that security services could one day use the technique to analyse people.

Airports, including Heathrow, Manchester and Gatwick are already testing iris scanning to identify people - but are not to check personality traits.

But Dr Fieldman added: "Security services would have to use such technologies with some caution. You would not want to arrest somebody on the basis of their iris."

Back to Top

Cervical Cancer Vaccine
A vaccine that is claimed to prevent cancer is causing damage that is a precursor to cancer?

Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in Dandenong, Melbourne
(web site http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very concerned at what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience will not allow him to stay silent.

In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In each of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was observing, he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer vaccine. All were virgins.

Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It can also cause infertility - as it can prevent the embryo from being able to hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of sensitivity with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent discharges.

Note that it has already been observed that one of the ingredients in the vaccine, polysorbate 80, has been observed to cause infertility in mice. Add to that borax, which is used to kill ants, add neurotoxic immune system sensitiser aluminium hydroxyphosphate, and directly inject all of that and any viral material (which is not proven to be in a harmless form) past the very important natural lines of defence in the immune system, then what do you think we are asking for, trouble or protection? I can't tell you what to do - you must figure it out for yourself.

Note also that the primary owners of the main pharmaceutical companies, including the manufacturer of this vaccine, are the extremely wealthy and powerful Rockefeller family. It is well documented that this family prefers to work behind the scenes, and they have also expressed a strong belief in population control. David Icke in his book entitled, "... and the truth shall set you free", wrote:

'In 1952, after decades of funding and supporting eugenics, John D. Rockefeller III established his Population Council, which still exists today. This Elite front has been calling for zero population growth in the United States and, in the words of its 1979 annual report: ... "the spread of the zero population movement... in the developed countries." '

In the population control agenda there does seem to be a particular interest in reducing the population of those of what is considered "lesser stock" (see http://www.thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm), yet all sections of the community are encouraged to receive the vaccine, but do you know which schools and localities are getting which batches of vaccine? Something to think about.

By the way, as all other vaccines, no proper placebo-controlled studies have been done with this vaccine. The so-called placebo group receives an injection of aluminium hydroxyphosphate "and everything else present in the adjuvant", according to the contact researcher for the major trials. Why don't they receive an inactive substance, which is what a placebo is defined to be? Apparently because, in the understanding of this researcher, "In vaccine trials,... (it) is usual, good clinical practice, to give adjuvant to the placebo arm." So what are these researchers (manufacturer-funded, of course) so afraid of, that they will not give a proper placebo to the placebo group?

Back to Top